Vasile Gaburici
2008-08-21 15:23:37 UTC
I see that MinionPro.sty contains CMap additions like:
\pdfglyphtounicode{uniF628}{2030}% perthousand.oldstyle
\pdfglyphtounicode{uniF62C}{0028}% parenleft.denominator
But they are all of the blather.alternate form. According to the Adobe
documentation[*], pdftex should automatically drop the dot and
anything after it in the name when the CMap is generated. So all those
lines in MinionPro.sty should be unnecessary. If they are necessary
however, than that's a bug in pdftex. Did you guys discuss this with
the pdftex devs? AFAICT, no other package in TeXLive 2008 makes any
calls to \pdfglyphtounicode besides the master pdftex list in
glyphtounicode.tex, of course.
[*] References:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/opentype/archives/glyph.html
http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Glyph%20names.pdf
\pdfglyphtounicode{uniF628}{2030}% perthousand.oldstyle
\pdfglyphtounicode{uniF62C}{0028}% parenleft.denominator
But they are all of the blather.alternate form. According to the Adobe
documentation[*], pdftex should automatically drop the dot and
anything after it in the name when the CMap is generated. So all those
lines in MinionPro.sty should be unnecessary. If they are necessary
however, than that's a bug in pdftex. Did you guys discuss this with
the pdftex devs? AFAICT, no other package in TeXLive 2008 makes any
calls to \pdfglyphtounicode besides the master pdftex list in
glyphtounicode.tex, of course.
[*] References:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/opentype/archives/glyph.html
http://blogs.adobe.com/typblography/typotechnica2007/Glyph%20names.pdf